Agenda, decisions and minutes

Council - Thursday, 21st January, 2021 7.30 pm

Venue: This will be a virtual meeting

Contact: Committee Services (01462) 474655  Email: committee.services@north-herts.gov.uk

Media

Items
No. Item

65.

WELCOME AND REMOTE/PARTLY REMOTE MEETINGS PROTOCOL SUMMARY pdf icon PDF 259 KB

Members are requested to ensure that they are familiar with the attached summary of the Remote/Partly Remote Meetings Protocol. The full Remote/Partly Remote Meetings Protocol has been published and is available here: https://www.north-herts.gov.uk/home/council-and-democracy/council-and-committee-meetings.

Decision:

The Chair welcomed everyone to this virtual Council meeting that was being conducted with Members and Officers at various locations, communicating via audio/video and online. There was also the opportunity for the public and press to listen to and view proceedings.

 

The Chair invited the Committee, Member and Scrutiny Manager to explain how proceedings would work and to confirm that Members and Officers were in attendance.

 

The Committee, Member and Scrutiny Manager undertook a roll call to ensure that all Members and Officers could hear and be heard and gave advice regarding the following:

 

The meeting was being streamed live onto You Tube and recorded via Zoom.

 

Extracts from the Remote/Partly Remote Meetings Protocol was included with the agenda and the full version was available on the Council’s website which included information regarding:

 

·                Live Streaming;

·                Noise Interference;

·                Rules of Debate and

·                Voting

 

Members were requested to ensure that they were familiar with the Protocol.

 

The Committee, Member and Scrutiny Manager advised Members that, due to a software update by Zoom, our usual voting procedure had been disrupted and would no longer work as required. This was not something that we had any control over or could do anything about.

 

For the purposes of this meeting Member will vote using the raise hand button. For each vote those voting for a motion would be asked to use the raise hand function. Once counted, the votes will be cleared and Members voting against the motion would be asked to use the raise hand button, once counted the votes would be cleared and the process would be repeated for those who wished to Abstain. This process would extend the time taken to vote therefore Members were asked to please be patient.

 

The Vice-Chair of the Council, Councillor Val Bryant started the meeting proper.

Minutes:

Audio recording – 8 seconds

 

The Chair welcomed everyone to this virtual Council meeting that was being conducted with Members and Officers at various locations, communicating via audio/video and online. There was also the opportunity for the public and press to listen to and view proceedings.

 

The Chair invited the Committee, Member and Scrutiny Manager to explain how proceedings would work and to confirm that Members and Officers were in attendance.

 

The Committee, Member and Scrutiny Manager undertook a roll call to ensure that all Members and Officers could hear and be heard and gave advice regarding the following:

 

The meeting was being streamed live onto You Tube and recorded via Zoom.

 

Extracts from the Remote/Partly Remote Meetings Protocol was included with the agenda and the full version was available on the Council’s website which included information regarding:

 

           Live Streaming;

           Noise Interference;

           Rules of Debate and

           Voting

 

Members were requested to ensure that they were familiar with the Protocol.

 

The Committee, Member and Scrutiny Manager advised Members that, due to a software update by Zoom, our usual voting procedure had been disrupted and would no longer work as required. This was not something that we had any control over or could do anything about.

 

For the purposes of this meeting Member will vote using the raise hand button. For each vote those voting for a motion would be asked to use the raise hand function. Once counted, the votes will be cleared and Members voting against the motion would be asked to use the raise hand button, once counted the votes would be cleared and the process would be repeated for those who wished to Abstain. This process would extend the time taken to vote therefore Members were asked to please be patient.

 

The Vice-Chair of the Council, Councillor Val Bryant started the meeting proper.

66.

APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE

Decision:

Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Bill Davidson, Steve Deakin-Davies, Gary Grindal, Kay Tart, Terry Tyler and Michael Weeks.

Minutes:

Audio recording – 6 minutes 26 seconds

 

Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Bill Davidson, Steve Deakin-Davies, Gary Grindal, Kay Tart, Terry Tyler and Michael Weeks.

67.

MINUTES - 6 FEBRUARY 2020 TO 12 NOVEMBER 2020 pdf icon PDF 322 KB

To take as read and approve as a true record the minutes of the meetings of the Committee held on the following dates:

 

6 February 2020;

27 February 2020;

16 April 2020;

4 June 2020;

9 July 2020;

27 August 2020;

24 September 2020;

8 October 2020;

12 November 2020.

Additional documents:

Decision:

RESOLVED:

 

(1)       That the Minutes of the meetings of Cabinet held on 6 February 2020, 27 February 2020, 16 April 2020, 4 June 2020, 9 July 2020, 27 August 2020, 24 September 2020, 8 October 2020 and 12 November 2020 be approved as a true record of the proceedings;

 

(2)       That, with the authorisation of the Vice-Chair, her electronic signature and initials be attached to the Minutes approved in (1) above.

Minutes:

Audio Recording – 6 minutes 43 seconds

 

The Vice-Chair advised that since the beginning of March, when NHDC started to hold meetings remotely, it had not been possible to approve Minutes of meetings. Minutes could now be approved with the electronic signature of the Chair of the meeting being applied following approval.

 

There were 9 sets of Minutes to agree:

 

·                6 February 2020;

·                27 February 2020;

·                16 April 2020;

·                4 June 2020;

·                9 July 2020;

·                27 August 2020;

·                24 September 2020;

·                8 October 2020;

·                12 November 2020.

 

Some Members commented that it was difficult to recall what happened February 2020.

 

Councillor Val Bryant proposed, Councillor Martin Stears-Handscomb seconded and it was:

 

RESOLVED:

 

(1)       That the Minutes of the meetings of Cabinet held on 6 February 2020, 27 February 2020, 16 April 2020, 4 June 2020, 9 July 2020, 27 August 2020, 24 September 2020, 8 October 2020 and 12 November 2020 be approved as a true record of the proceedings;

 

(2)       That, with the authorisation of the Vice-Chair, her electronic signature and initials be attached to the Minutes approved in (1) above.

68.

NOTIFICATION OF OTHER BUSINESS

Members should notify the Chair of other business which they wish to be discussed at the end of either Part I or Part II business set out in the agenda. They must state the circumstances which they consider justify the business being considered as a matter of urgency.

 

The Chair will decide whether any item(s) raised will be considered.

Decision:

There was no other business notified.

Minutes:

Audio recording – 11 minutes 55 seconds

 

There was no other business notified.

69.

CHAIR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS

Climate Emergency

Members are reminded that this Council has declared a Climate Emergency. This is a serious decision and means that, as this is an emergency, all of us, officers and Members have that in mind as we carry out our various roles and tasks for the benefit of our District.

 

Declarations of Interest

Members are reminded that any declarations of interest in respect of any business set out in the agenda, should be declared as either a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest or Declarable Interest and are required to notify the Chair of the nature of any interest declared at the commencement of the relevant item on the agenda. Members declaring a Disclosable Pecuniary Interest must withdraw from the meeting for the duration of the item. Members declaring a Declarable Interest, wishing to exercise a ‘Councillor Speaking Right’, must declare this at the same time as the interest, move to the public area before speaking to the item and then must leave the room before the debate and vote.

Decision:

(1)     Audio Recording

 

The Vice-Chair advised that, in accordance with Council policy this meeting was being audio recorded as well as filmed. The audio recordings would be available to view on Mod.gov and the film recording via the NHDC YouTube channel.

 

(2)     Climate Emergency

 

Members were reminded that this Council had declared a Climate Emergency. This was a serious decision and meant that, as this was an emergency, all of us, officers and Members had that in mind as we carried out our various roles and tasks for the benefit of our District.

 

(3)     Declarations of Interest

 

Members were reminded to make declarations of interest before an item, the detailed reminder about this and speaking rights was set out under Chair’s Announcements on the agenda.

 

(4)       Rules of Debate

 

The Vice-Chair reminded Members that the normal procedure rules in respect of debate and times to speak would apply:

 

No speeches may be made after the mover has moved a proposal and explained the purpose of it until the motion had been seconded.

 

When seconding a motion or amendment, a Member may reserve their speech until later in the debate. 

 

In accordance with the Constitution Members was asked to ensure that no speech exceeded five minutes without the consent of the Vice-Chair.

 

(5)       Comfort Break

 

The Vice-Chair advised that, if the meeting was still in progress at 9pm, she would call a comfort break at an appropriate place.

 

(6)       Order of Business

 

The Vice-Chair advised that the order of the agenda did not accord with the order of business that was set out in the Constitution, which was a mistake when the agenda was compiled.

 

Having been made aware of this and on reflection, with the aim of improved community engagement, she had agreed to these items being moved earlier in the agenda, when members of the public were more likely to be engaged and wish to participate and watch. 

 

Future agendas would reflect that as set out in the constitution.

 

In respect of the Items regarding Covid-19 Leisure Contracts Recovery, the Vice-Chair would take Item 15 the Part 2 item prior to Item 13 the Part 1 item.

Minutes:

Audio recording – 12 minutes 3 seconds

 

(1)     Audio Recording

 

The Vice-Chair advised that, in accordance with Council policy this meeting was being audio recorded as well as filmed. The audio recordings would be available to view on Mod.gov and the film recording via the NHDC YouTube channel.

 

(2)     Climate Emergency

 

Members were reminded that this Council had declared a Climate Emergency. This was a serious decision and meant that, as this was an emergency, all of us, officers and Members had that in mind as we carried out our various roles and tasks for the benefit of our District.

 

(3)     Declarations of Interest

 

Members were reminded to make declarations of interest before an item, the detailed reminder about this and speaking rights was set out under Chair’s Announcements on the agenda.

 

(4)       Rules of Debate

 

The Vice-Chair reminded Members that the normal procedure rules in respect of debate and times to speak would apply:

 

No speeches may be made after the mover has moved a proposal and explained the purpose of it until the motion had been seconded.

 

When seconding a motion or amendment, a Member may reserve their speech until later in the debate. 

 

In accordance with the Constitution Members was asked to ensure that no speech exceeded five minutes without the consent of the Vice-Chair.

 

(5)       Comfort Break

 

The Vice-Chair advised that, if the meeting was still in progress at 9pm, she would call a comfort break at an appropriate place.

 

(6)       Order of Business

 

The Vice-Chair advised that the order of the agenda did not accord with the order of business that was set out in the Constitution, which was a mistake when the agenda was compiled.

 

Having been made aware of this and on reflection, with the aim of improved community engagement, she had agreed to these items being moved earlier in the agenda, when members of the public were more likely to be engaged and wish to participate and watch. 

 

Future agendas would reflect that as set out in the constitution.

 

In respect of the Items regarding Covid-19 Leisure Contracts Recovery, the Vice-Chair would take Item 15 the Part 2 item prior to Item 13 the Part 1 item.

70.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

To receive petitions, comments and questions from the public.

Decision:

Ms Rosie Waters, Citizens Advice North Herts thanked the Chair for the opportunity to address Council.

 

The Chair thanked Ms Waters for her presentation.

Minutes:

Audio recording – 14 minutes 42 seconds

 

Ms Rosie Waters, Citizens Advice North Herts thanked the Chair for the opportunity to address Council as follows:

 

·                They had just completed first year of a three year financial agreement with NHDC;

·                Last year NHDC agreed a one year uplift of £50,000

·                They need the uplift again this year

·                Covd-19 had resulted in a reduction in the number of clients but the demand was for more complex issues;

·                Issues included, lack of money, use of foodbanks, domestic violence and loss of jobs to mention just a few;

·                They had signposted many people to one of the many voluntary organisations such as those delivering food and medicine;

·                Since March 2020 they had support 4.433 clients with almost 9,000 issues and had achieved financial outcomes for clients of £1.1 million;

·                Clients were 92 percent likely to recommend their services and feedback included that they felt better after talking to CAB;

·                The uplift received last year had mainly been spent on increasing supervisor capacity, which allowed them to seamlessly transfer to 100 percent homeworking;

·                They had run some very successful “pop up” sessions and would be extending this once restrictions were lifted;

·                An uplift of funding was required for the next year to enable them to continue with their work, which helped reduce the number of people contacting the Council;

·                Existing funding  was stretched by using highly experienced volunteers and this funding was used to leverage other funding streams;

·                Covid had taught them a lot and has accelerated plans including increased use of digital channels;

·                They hoped to extend their physical presence to more places across the district as soon as restrictions allowed;

·                The work was more intensive so there was a need to recruit and train more volunteers as well as upskill existing volunteers.

 

The following Members asked questions:

 

·                Councillor Judi Billing

·                Councillor Ian Albert

·                Councillor David Levett

 

In response to questions Ms Waters advised:

 

·                If did not receive the £50,000 uplift in 2021/22:

·                       they would not be able to open for as many hours, probably resulting in closing for a day and half a week

·                       Would have to make a choice about limiting channels that were available to access services.

·                Last year’s uplift was used:

·                       Initially to fund a new support worker to visit clients

·                       Subsequently for supervision

·                They did support clients from just outside the area, such as Fairfield Park

·                They had a reciprocal arrangement with Mid Beds which meant that they gave initial advice to people from Bedfordshire, but if they needed more then they were referred to Mid Beds.

 

The Vice-Chair thanked Ms Waters for her presentation.

71.

QUESTIONS FROM MEMBERS pdf icon PDF 107 KB

To consider any questions submitted by Members of the Council, in accordance with Standing Order 4.8.11 (b).

Decision:

In accordance with Standing Order 4.8.11(b), three questions had been submitted by Members of the Conservative Group by the deadline date for questions set out in the Council’s Constitution.

 

(A)     Unlawfully Parked Vehicles

 

Councillor Jim McNally to Councillor Paul Clark (Executive Member for Planning and Transport).

 

(B)     Progress of Work on the New Settlement

 

Councillor David Levett to Councillor Paul Clark (Executive Member for Planning and Transport).

 

(C)     Local Election Safeguards

 

Councillor Morgan Derbyshire to Councillor Martin Stears-Handscomb (Leader of the Council).

Minutes:

Audio recording – 24 minutes 43 seconds

 

In accordance with Standing Order 4.8.11(b), three questions had been submitted by Members of the Conservative Group by the deadline date for questions set out in the Council’s

Constitution.

 

(A)       Unlawfully Parked Vehicles

 

Councillor Jim McNally to Councillor Paul Clark (Executive Member for Planning and Transport):

 

“Members were advised, via the MIS of 18 December 2020, that the minimum set period for observing vehicles unlawfully parked on yellow lines was to be reduced from 5 minutes to 2 minutes. The record of the decision taken under delegated authority states at paragraph 6.1 that ‘The Executive Member for Planning & Transport & Deputy as well as other ward councillors have been informed and are supportive of the decision taken’. Can the Executive Member inform Council which ward councillors were informed and when?”

 

Councillor Paul Clark responded as follows:

 

“We are aware of concerns raised around the District raised by residents concerning anti-social parking, one area being anti-social parking particularly outside take always and other areas such as post offices and ATMs within the town centres and also within neighbourhood centres.

 

Examples include:

 

In Baldock:

Bell Row

Issue previously raised by Cllr Muir and local residents with vehicles parking in the street and across entrance ways picking up takeaways.

       

In Hitchin:

Bancroft

With the Chicken George Takeaway

Takeaways in Nightingale Road

This has been an on-going issue and has increased during the pandemic with issues raised by residents

Pizza Kebab and Curry Houses on the corner of Bearton Road and Brampton Park Road

Issue previously raised by Councillor Judi Billing and local residents

Highbury Road Post Office

On-going issues and previously raised by local ward Councillors.

 

In Royston:

Takeaways in Melbourne Street near the pedestrian crossing

Issue raised by parking services team

 

On a general point our Parking Enforcement officers continually encounter issues with vehicles parking on double yellow lines, which has increased during the pandemic, particularly with click and collect and more restaurants offering takeaways

 

This is not to adversely affect businesses only to encourage those using these businesses to park responsibly on street;

 

We are aware of cars not moving on when a Civil Enforcement Officer asks, as they are aware of the 5 minute period;

 

It is not deemed appropriate to have a zero time period in terms of loading and unloading, Civil Enforcement Officers (CEO’s) do need an observation period;

 

Ward Councillors were made aware of the option on one particular situation where relationships between those parking illegally and anti-socially and the residents is causing concern, this is in relation to the correspondence over the Chicken George (Councillors that officers liaised with were Councillors Keith Hoskins, Judi Billing, Ian Albert, Sam Collins, County Councillor Derrick Ashley, Councillors Ian Mantle and Paul Clark);

 

Other Ward Councillors were made aware in MIS dated 18 December 2020, regarding the Delegated decision notice issued, no comments were received in respect of this delegated report from any Councillor.

 

It was also included in the Shadow Portfolio Holder briefing  ...  view the full minutes text for item 71.

72.

NOTICE OF MOTIONS

To consider any motions, due notice of which have been given in accordance with Standing Order 4.8.12.

Decision:

No motions had been submitted.

Minutes:

Audio recording – 40 minutes 18 seconds

 

No motions had been submitted.

73.

ITEMS REFERRED FROM OTHER COMMITTEES pdf icon PDF 96 KB

Any Items referred from other committees will be circulated as soon as they are available.

Additional documents:

Decision:

A       Referral from Cabinet: 15 December 2020 - IT Capital - Purchase of Laptops

 

RESOLVED:

 

(1)       That the capital programme for IT spend is amended as detailed in 7.4 Table 2 to enable IT to progress the procurement of laptops for staff to facilitate more effective home working arrangements. The net impact is an increase in spend in 2021/22 of £55k as detailed in 7.5 and shown in Table 3;

 

(2)       That £50k of the capital is bought forward into this year’s budget so that the IT Manager can progress the procurement of the first batch of laptops so that delivery to staff can happen at the earliest opportunity.

 

REASONS FOR DECISIONS:

 

(1)       To enable a continued agile way of working which has been brought about by the Coronavirus pandemic, increasing flexibility and business continuity resilience and ensuring a future proofed approach;

 

(2)       To avoid additional capital costs associated with a requirement to increase Microsoft licences where users have a personal computer in the office and an NHDC provided device at home;

 

(3)       To respond to feedback from the staff survey regarding the need for staff to be provided with equipment that have cameras and microphones to enable council wide participation in meetings and similar activities;

 

(4)       To enable the procurement, build and distribution of laptops to take place ahead of the new financial year, considering supplier lead in times and scheduling of resources in the IT team.

 

B       Referral from Cabinet: 15 December 2020 - Investment Strategy (Capital and Treasury) Mid-Year Review 2020-21

         

RESOLVED: That the position of Treasury Management activity as at the end of September 2020 be noted.

 

REASONS FOR DECISION:

 

(1)     Cabinet is required to approve adjustments to the capital programme and ensure the capital programme is fully funded;

 

(2)     To ensure the Council’s continued compliance with CIPFA’s code of practice on Treasury Management and the Local Government Act 2003 and that the Council manages its exposure to interest and capital risk.

 

C       Referral from Cabinet: 15 December 2020 - Covid-19 Leisure Contracts Recovery

 

The Chair advised that this referral would be taken with Items 13 and 15.

Minutes:

Audio recording – 40 minutes 24 seconds

 

A          Referral from Cabinet: 15 December 2020 - IT Capital - Purchase of Laptops

 

The Executive Member for Finance and IT presented the referral from Cabinet regarding IT Capital – Purchase of Laptops, which was considered at the meeting held on 15 December 2020.

 

He advised that:

 

        This was regarding the reprofiling of the IT budget to purchase equipment:

        The Council had been working remotely for approximately 10 months and some staff were not equipped to take part in virtual meetings as current desktop equipment did not have cameras, microphones etc.

        It was important that staff and councillors were adequately equipped;

        The issuing of laptops instead of desktop equipment would enable more mobile working and would result in savings in license fees, which have to be purchased for each set of equipment.

 

Cabinet recommended to Council:

(1)     That the capital programme for IT spend is amended as detailed in 7.4 Table 2 to enable IT to progress the procurement of laptops for staff to facilitate more effective home working arrangements. The net impact is an increase in spend in 2021/22 of £55k as detailed in 7.5 and shown in Table 3;

(2)     That £50k of the capital is bought forward into this year’s budget so that the IT Manager can progress the procurement of the first batch of laptops so that delivery to staff can happen at the earliest opportunity.

 

Councillor Ian Albert proposed, Councillor Sam North seconded and it was:

 

RESOLVED:

 

(1)     That the capital programme for IT spend is amended as detailed in 7.4 Table 2 to enable IT to progress the procurement of laptops for staff to facilitate more effective home working arrangements. The net impact is an increase in spend in 2021/22 of £55k as detailed in 7.5 and shown in Table 3;

 

(2)     That £50k of the capital is bought forward into this year’s budget so that the IT Manager can progress the procurement of the first batch of laptops so that delivery to staff can happen at the earliest opportunity.

 

REASONS FOR DECISIONS:

 

(1)       To enable a continued agile way of working which has been brought about by the Coronavirus pandemic, increasing flexibility and business continuity resilience and ensuring a future proofed approach;

 

(2)       To avoid additional capital costs associated with a requirement to increase Microsoft licences where users have a personal computer in the office and an NHDC provided device at home;

 

(3)       To respond to feedback from the staff survey regarding the need for staff to be provided with equipment that have cameras and microphones to enable council wide participation in meetings and similar activities;

 

(4)       To enable the procurement, build and distribution of laptops to take place ahead of the new financial year, considering supplier lead in times and scheduling of resources in the IT team.

 

B       Referral from Cabinet: 15 December 2020 - Investment Strategy (Capital and Treasury) Mid-Year Review 2020-21

 

The Executive Member for Finance and IT presented  ...  view the full minutes text for item 73.

74.

COUNCIL TAX REDUCTION SCHEME pdf icon PDF 734 KB

REPORT OF THE SERVICE DIRECTOR-CUSTOMERS

 

To approve the Council Tax Reduction Scheme (CTRS) for North Hertfordshire for 2021/2022.

Decision:

RESOLVED:

 

(1)       That Council notes the CTRS position relating to this and previous financial years.

 

(2)       That Council notes that a full review of the CTRS has commenced and been postponed due to the consequences on the Scheme of the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

(3)       That Council confirm that the amounts continue to be distributed to Parish, Town & Community Councils in 2021/22.

 

(4)       That no changes to the CTRS be made for 2021/2022.

 

REASON FOR DECISIONS: To update Council on how the Scheme is working and to note that the full review planned to take place during 2020/2021 was postponed due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Minutes:

Audio recording – 54 minutes 16 seconds

 

The Executive Member for Finance and IT presented the report entitled Council Tax Reduction Scheme.

 

He advised that:

 

·                The Service Director – Customers and her team should be thanked for the work undertaken regarding the Council Tax Reduction Scheme;

·                There had been an almost 16 percent increase in those claiming

·                It had been the intention to carry out a full review of the scheme this year, but this had not been possible due to the pandemic and the impact on claimants;

·                It was hoped to undertake a full review in the next year, but this was dependent on the pandemic situation;

·                The additional support payment was proposed to continue at the current levels for 2021/22.

 

The following Member took part in the debate:

 

·                Councillor Sam North.

 

Councillor Ian Albert proposed, Councillor Sam North seconded and it was:

 

RESOLVED:

 

(1)       That Council notes the CTRS position relating to this and previous financial years.

 

(2)       That Council notes that a full review of the CTRS has commenced and been postponed due to the consequences on the Scheme of the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

(3)       That Council confirm that the amounts continue to be distributed to Parish, Town & Community Councils in 2021/22.

 

(4)       That no changes to the CTRS be made for 2021/2022.

 

REASON FOR DECISIONS: To update Council on how the Scheme is working and to note that the full review planned to take place during 2020/2021 was postponed due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

75.

REVIEW OF MEMBERS' ALLOWANCES SCHEME pdf icon PDF 580 KB

REPORT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SERVOCES MANAGER

 

To agree the Members' Allowances Scheme 2021/2022 having taken into account the recommendations of the Independent Remuneration Panel.

Additional documents:

Decision:

Councillor Martin Stears-Handscomb proposed and Councillor Judi Billing seconded the proposals in the report.

 

Councillor David Levett proposed and Councillor Simon Harwood seconded the following amendments:

 

(1)       That there be an additional recommendation to thank the IRP for their work.

 

(2)       That the following words be added to the end of recommendation 2:

“Defer the application of the rise until 2022/23 .

 

The Service Director – Legal and Community advised that, in respect of the second part of the proposed amendment, any increase could not be deferred as Members would have to consider any report of the IRP next year.

 

Councillor David Levett proposed that the cost of living rise not be taken.

 

Councillor Martin Stears-Handscomb raised a point of order in that the recommendations should be taken as they stood

 

The Service Director Legal and Community advised that the proposed amendment to not take the cost of living rise was not a valid amendment as it negated the recommendation rather than amended it.

 

Councillor Sam Collins called for a recorded vote on recommendation 2.2 and a separate vote by raise of hands on recommendations 2.1, 2.3 and 2.4 together.

 

A recorded vote was taken regarding recommendation 2.2 the result being:

 

For:

Councillors: Ian Albert, Daniel Allen, Kate Aspinwall, Clare Billing, Judi Billing, Ruth Brown, Val Bryant, Paul Clark, Elizabeth Dennis-Harburg, Keith Hoskins, Mike Hughson, Ian Mantle, Sue Ngwala, Sam North, Helen Oliver, Adem Ruggiero-Cakir and Martin Stears-Handscomb.

Total For: 17

 

Against:

Councillors: David Barnard, Sam Collins, Morgan Derbyshire, Faye Frost, Jean Green, Simon Harwood, Terry Hone, Tony Hunter, Steve Jarvis, David Levett, Jim McNally, Ian Moody, Gerald Morris, Michael Muir, Lisa Nash, Sean Prendergast, Mike Rice, Valentine Shanley, Carol Stanier, Claire Strong, Richard Thake and Tom Tyson.

Total Against: 22

  

Abstain:

Councillors: John Bishop and George Davies.

Total Abstain: 2

 

Therefore the motion was lost

 

Councillor Martin Stears-Handscomb proposed and Councillor Judi Billing seconded:

 

(1)       That the 2020/21 Members’ Allowances Scheme continue unchanged for 2021/22;

 

(2)       That the increase to the Independent Person and Reserve Independent Persons allowances as detailed in Appendix A and 8.9 of the report be agreed;

 

(3)       That the IRP be thanked for their work.

 

Upon the vote it was:

 

RESOLVED:

 

(1)       That the 2020/21 Members’ Allowances Scheme continue unchanged for 2021/22;

 

(2)       That the increase to the Independent Person and Reserve Independent Persons allowances as detailed in Appendix A and 8.9 of the report be agreed;

 

(3)       That the IRP be thanked for their work.

 

REASON FOR DECISIONS: To ensure that the Council meets its statutory requirements of an annual review and adoption of the scheme.

 

NB: At 9.20pm the Chair announced there would be a 5 minute comfort break.

Minutes:

Audio recording – 1 hour 1 minute 50 seconds

 

The Democratic Services Manager presented the report entitled Review of Members’ Allowances Scheme together with the following appendices:

 

·                Appendix A - Report and Recommendations by the IRP on the Members’ Allowances Scheme 2021/2022;

·                Appendix B - Proposed Members’ Allowances Scheme 2021/2022 with tracked changes (2020/2021 with proposed Scheme highlighted).

 

She advised that there was a correction to Paragraph 10.1 of the report in that, following further analysis of the finances, the recommended increases could be provided within the current budget, so no increase in budget was required.

 

Councillor Martin Stears-Handscomb proposed and Councillor Judi Billing seconded the proposals in the report.

 

Councillor David Levett proposed and Councillor Simon Harwood seconded the following amendments:

 

(1)       That there be an additional recommendation to thank the IRP for their work.

 

(2)       That the following words be added to the end of recommendation 2:

“Defer the application of the rise until 2022/23.

 

The Service Director – Legal and Community advised that, in respect of the second part of the proposed amendment, any increase could not be deferred as Members would have to consider any report of the IRP next year.

 

Councillor David Levett proposed and Councillor Simon Harwood seconded that the cost of living rise not be taken.

 

Councillor Martin Stears-Handscomb raised a point of order in that the recommendations should be taken as they stood

 

The Service Director Legal and Community advised that the proposed amendment to not take the cost of living rise was not a valid amendment as it negated the recommendation rather than amended it.

 

Councillor Sam Collins called for a recorded vote on recommendation 2.2 and a separate vote by raise of hands on recommendations 2.1, 2.3 and 2.4 together.

 

Councillor Levett asked for separate votes for each recommendation.

 

The following Members took part in the debate:

 

·                Councillor Sam Collins;

·                Councillor Ruth Brown;

·                Councillor Helen Oliver;

·                Councillor Claire Strong;

·                Councillor Daniel Allen;

·                Councillor Richard Thake;

·                Councillor Simon Harwood;

·                Councillor David Barnard;

·                Councillor Jean Green;

·                Councillor David Levett;

·                Councillor Judi Billing;

·                Councillor Sam North;

·                Councillor Martin Stears-Handscomb.

 

The Committee, Member and Scrutiny Manager clarified with relevant Members that a recorded vote would be taken regarding recommendation 2.2, Recommendations 2.1,2.3 and 2.4 would be taken together and voted on by raise of hands.

 

A recorded vote was taken regarding recommendation 2.2 the result being:

 

For:

Councillors: Ian Albert, Daniel Allen, Kate Aspinwall, Clare Billing, Judi Billing, Ruth Brown, Val Bryant, Paul Clark, Elizabeth Dennis-Harburg, Keith Hoskins, Mike Hughson, Ian Mantle, Sue Ngwala, Sam North, Helen Oliver, Adem Ruggiero-Cakir and Martin Stears-Handscomb.

Total For: 17

 

Against:

Councillors: David Barnard, Sam Collins, Morgan Derbyshire, Faye Frost, Jean Green, Simon Harwood, Terry Hone, Tony Hunter, Steve Jarvis, David Levett, Jim McNally, Ian Moody, Gerald Morris, Michael Muir, Lisa Nash, Sean Prendergast, Mike Rice, Valentine Shanley, Carol Stanier, Claire Strong, Richard Thake and Tom Tyson.

Total Against: 22

  

Abstain:

Councillors: John Bishop and George Davies.

Total Abstain: 2

 

Therefore the motion was lost.

 

Councillor  ...  view the full minutes text for item 75.

76.

ELECTORAL SERVICES - SCALE OF FEES 2021/22 pdf icon PDF 302 KB

REPORT OF THE SERVICE DIRECTOR – RESOURCES

To agree the Scale of Fees for electoral events held during 2021/22.

Additional documents:

Decision:

NB: The meeting resumed at 9.25pm

 

The Committee, member and Scrutiny Manager undertook a roll call to ensure that all could hear and be heard.

 

The Democratic Services Manager recused herself from being present during the item due to her responsibilities as Returning Officer.

 

RESOLVED: That the Scale of Fees for 2021/22 as set out in Appendix A be agreed.

 

REASON FOR DECISION: To enable the Council to remunerate the Returning Officer and the staff employed to carry out tasks during electoral events and to be open and transparent regarding other payments. Previously this was dealt with under Delegated Decision prepared by the Democratic Services Manager for the then Returning Officer (the Chief Executive). Following the Council decision to appoint the Democratic Services Manager as the Returning Officer, this is no longer appropriate.

Minutes:

Audio recording – 1 hour 55 minutes 37 seconds

 

NB: The meeting resumed at 9.25pm

 

The Committee, Member and Scrutiny Manager undertook a roll call to ensure that all could hear and be heard.

 

The Democratic Services Manager recused herself from being present during the item due to her responsibilities as Returning Officer and was placed in a breakout room for the duration of the item.

 

The Service Director- Resources presented the report entitled Electoral Services – Scale of Fees 2021/22 together with the following appendix:

 

·                Appendix A - Electoral Services Scale of Fees 2021/2022.

 

He advised that:

 

·                The fees for the Returning Officer remain unchanged from last year;

·                The fees for other positions had been compared to the rates paid by other Councils;

·                It was proposed that these be set at a level where we can attract people to take on the roles;

·                Some fees had been simplified.

 

Councillor Martin Stears-Handscomb proposed, Councillor Paul Clark seconded and it was:

 

RESOLVED: That the Scale of Fees for 2021/22 as set out in Appendix A be agreed.

 

REASON FOR DECISION: To enable the Council to remunerate the Returning Officer and the staff employed to carry out tasks during electoral events and to be open and transparent regarding other payments. Previously this was dealt with under Delegated Decision prepared by the Democratic Services Manager for the then Returning Officer (the Chief Executive). Following the Council decision to appoint the Democratic Services Manager as the Returning Officer, this is no longer appropriate.

 

The Democratic Services Manager returned to the meeting.

77.

COVID LEISURE CONTRACTS RECOVERY pdf icon PDF 220 KB

REPORT OF THE SERVICE DIRECTOR – PLACE

 

To consider financial assistance support for Stevenage Leisure Ltd.

Decision:

NB This Item was considered following the Part 2 Item of the same name (Minute 79 refers)

 

The Committee Member and Scrutiny Manager undertook a roll call to ensure that all present could hear and be heard.

 

Prior to the item being discussed Councillor Claire Strong advised that she was a member of Archers Gym and would therefore not take part in the debate or vote.

 

Prior to the item being discussed Councillor Jim McNally advised that he regularly attended North Herts Leisure Centre and would therefore not take part in the debate and vote.

 

Councillor David Levett called for a recorded vote on recommendation 2.1 and a separate recorded vote on the recommendations contained in the Part 2 report.

 

RESOLVED:

 

(1)       That the Council supports the continued delivery of leisure facilities in the District to support the health and wellbeing of our residents;

 

(2)       That financial support is provided on an open-book basis to SLL to enable the leisure facilities to be open when Covid-19 restrictions allow. The support provided will reimburse any losses. The support to SLL in 2020/21 is forecast to be £2.45m (assuming the leisure facilities will now remain closed until the 31 March 2021). Future levels of support will depend on any further restrictions and the speed of recovery. It is assumed to be an additional £2m in 2021/22, but realistic scenarios show that it could be as low as £1.3m in 2021/22 (no further restrictions), or as much as £4.4m across 2021/22 (£3.1m) and 2022/23 (£1.3m).

 

(3)       That Council notes that the cost of not supporting SLL and closing the facilities could be as high as the cost of providing support.

 

(4)       That (following an initial payment to cover losses to date) payments to SLL are made on a monthly basis following submission of management accounts showing the extent of any losses. These accounts will be reviewed by the Service Director: Place in consultation with the Service Director: Resources, Executive Member for Environment and Leisure and Executive Member for Finance and IT. The affordability of payments will be kept under constant review by the Service Director: Resources, in consultation with the Executive Member for Finance and IT.

 

(5)       That Council notes that, in the event of higher levels of support being provided, budget savings in future years (2022/23 onwards) will need to be delivered more quickly than currently forecast.

 

REASON FOR DCISIONS: To seek approval to provide financial support on an open-book basis to SLL to enable the leisure facilities to be open when Covid-19 restrictions allow.

 

The recorded vote regarding Resolution (1) was as follows:

 

For:

Councillors: Ian Albert, Daniel Allen, Kate Aspinwall, David Barnard, Clare Billing, Judi Billing, John Bishop, Ruth Brown, Val Bryant, Paul Clark, Sam Collins, George Davies, Elizabeth Dennis-Harburg, Morgan Derbyshire, Faye Frost, Jean Green, Simon Harwood, Terry Hone, Keith Hoskins, Mike Hughson, Tony Hunter, Steve Jarvis, David Levett, Ian Mantle, Ian Moody, Gerald Morris, Michael Muir, Lisa Nash, Sue Ngwala, Sam North, Helen Oliver, Sean Prendergast, Mike  ...  view the full decision text for item 77.

Minutes:

Audio recording – 2 hours 52 minutes 5 seconds

 

NB This Item was considered following the Part 2 Item of the same name (Minute 79 refers)

 

The Committee Member and Scrutiny Manager undertook a roll call to ensure that all present could hear and be heard.

 

Prior to the item being discussed Councillor Claire Strong advised that she was a member of Archers Gym and would therefore not take part in the debate or vote.

 

Prior to the item being discussed Councillor Jim McNally advised that he regularly attended North Herts Leisure Centre and would therefore not take part in the debate and vote.

 

The Executive Member for Environment and Leisure presented the report entitled Covid Leisure Contracts Recovery and the referral from the Cabinet meeting held on 15 December 2020 (9c)

 

He advised that:

 

·                That a further lockdown had changed expectations in respect of leisure facilities;

·                It was currently expected that the leisure facilities would be closed until the end of March 2021;

·                This meant that the level of losses would exceed the £1.8 million previously agreed by Council;

·                If this Council wished to continue to provide the valued leisure facilities then the only option was for the Council to underwrite losses.

 

Councillor Steve Jarvis proposed and Councillor Ian Albert seconded the recommendations contained in both the Part 1 and Part 2 reports.

 

Councillor David Levett called for a recorded vote on recommendation 2.1 and a separate recorded vote on the recommendations contained in the Part 2 report.

 

The following Members took part in the debate and asked questions:

 

·                Councillor Gerald Morris;

·                Councillor Steve Jarvis;

·                Councillor Ian Albert;

·                Councillor David Levett.

 

In response to questions the Service Director – Resources advised that in the event that SLL went into administration any money paid would be lost.

 

Following recorded votes as detailed below it was:

 

RESOLVED:

 

(1)       That the Council supports the continued delivery of leisure facilities in the District to support the health and wellbeing of our residents;

 

(2)       That financial support is provided on an open-book basis to SLL to enable the leisure facilities to be open when Covid-19 restrictions allow. The support provided will reimburse any losses. The support to SLL in 2020/21 is forecast to be £2.45m (assuming the leisure facilities will now remain closed until the 31 March 2021). Future levels of support will depend on any further restrictions and the speed of recovery. It is assumed to be an additional £2m in 2021/22, but realistic scenarios show that it could be as low as £1.3m in 2021/22 (no further restrictions), or as much as £4.4m across 2021/22 (£3.1m) and 2022/23 (£1.3m).

 

(3)       That Council notes that the cost of not supporting SLL and closing the facilities could be as high as the cost of providing support.

 

(4)       That (following an initial payment to cover losses to date) payments to SLL are made on a monthly basis following submission of management accounts showing the extent of any losses. These accounts will be reviewed by the  ...  view the full minutes text for item 77.

78.

EXCLUSION OF PRESS AND PUBLIC

To consider passing the following resolution:

 

That under Section 100A of the Local Government Act 1972, the Press and Public be excluded from the meeting on the grounds that the following report will involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the said Act (as amended).

Decision:

RESOLVED:  That under Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public and press be excluded from the meeting for the following item of business on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the said Act (as amended).

Minutes:

Audio recording – 2 hours 3 minutes 8 seconds

 

Councillor Val Bryant proposed, Councillor Martin Stears-Handscomb seconded and it was:

 

RESOLVED:  That under Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public and press be excluded from the meeting for the following item of business on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the said Act (as amended).

79.

COVID-19 LEISURE CONTRACTS RECOVERY

REPORT OF THE SERVICE DIRECTOR – PLACE

 

To consider financial assistance support for Stevenage Leisure Ltd.

 

 

Decision:

NB: This item was not audio recorded or filmed

 

NB This Item was considered prior to the Part 1 Item of the same name (Minute 77 refers)

 

The Committee, Member and Scrutiny Manager undertook a roll call to ensure that all present could hear and be heard.

 

Prior to the item being discussed Councillor Claire Strong advised that she was a member of Archers Gym and would therefore not take part in the debate or vote.

 

Prior to the item being discussed Councillor Jim McNally advised that he regularly attended North Herts Leisure Centre and would therefore not take part in the debate and vote.

 

RESOLVED:

 

(1)       That financial support is provided on an open-book basis to SLL to enable the leisure facilities to be open when Covid-19 restrictions allow. The support provided will reimburse any losses. The support to SLL in 2020/21 is forecast to be £2.45m (assuming the leisure facilities will now remain closed until the 31 March 2021). Future levels of support will depend on any further restrictions and the speed of recovery. It is assumed to be an additional £2m in 2021/22, but realistic scenarios show that it could be as low as £1.3m in 2021/22 (no further restrictions), or as much as £4.4m across 2021/22 (£3.1m) and 2022/23 (£1.3m).

 

(2)       That Council notes that the cost of not supporting SLL and closing the facilities could be as high as the cost of providing support.

 

(3)       That (following an initial payment to cover losses to date) payments to SLL are made on a monthly basis following submission of management accounts showing the extent of any losses. These accounts will be reviewed by the Service Director: Place in consultation with the Service Director: Resources, Executive Member for Environment and Leisure and Executive Member for Finance and IT. The affordability of payments will be kept under constant review by the Service Director: Resources, in consultation with the Executive Member for Finance and IT.

 

(4)       That Council notes that, in the event of higher levels of support being provided, budget savings in future years (2022/23 onwards) will need to be delivered more quickly than currently forecast.

 

REASON FOR DECISIONS: To seek approval to provide financial support on an open-book basis to SLL to enable the leisure facilities to be open when Covid-19 restrictions allow.

Minutes:

NB: This item was not audio recorded or filmed

 

NB This Item was considered prior to the Part 1 Item of the same name (Minute 77 refers)

 

The Committee, Member and Scrutiny Manager undertook a roll call to ensure that all present could hear and be heard.

 

Prior to the item being discussed Councillor Claire Strong advised that she was a member of Archers Gym and would therefore not take part in the debate or vote.

 

Prior to the item being discussed Councillor Jim McNally advised that he regularly attended North Herts Leisure Centre and would therefore not take part in the debate and vote.

 

The Executive Member for Environment and Leisure presented the Part 2 report entitled Covid Leisure Contracts Recovery and the Part 2 referral from the Cabinet meeting held on 15 December 2020 (9c)

 

The following Members took part in the detailed debate and asked questions:

 

·                Councillor Simon Harwood;

·                Councillor John Bishop;

·                Councillor Sam North;

·                Councillor Martin Stears-Handscomb;

·                Councillor Sam Collins;

·                Councillor Helen Oliver;

·                Councillor Judi Billing;

·                Councillor David Levett;

·                Councillor Ian Albert;

·                Councillor Steve Jarvis.

 

Questions were responded to by the Service Director – Legal and Community

 

Councillor Steve Jarvis proposed, Councillor Ian Albert seconded and it was:

 

RESOLVED:

 

(1)       That financial support is provided on an open-book basis to SLL to enable the leisure facilities to be open when Covid-19 restrictions allow. The support provided will reimburse any losses. The support to SLL in 2020/21 is forecast to be £2.45m (assuming the leisure facilities will now remain closed until the 31 March 2021). Future levels of support will depend on any further restrictions and the speed of recovery. It is assumed to be an additional £2m in 2021/22, but realistic scenarios show that it could be as low as £1.3m in 2021/22 (no further restrictions), or as much as £4.4m across 2021/22 (£3.1m) and 2022/23 (£1.3m).

 

(2)       That Council notes that the cost of not supporting SLL and closing the facilities could be as high as the cost of providing support.

 

(3)       That (following an initial payment to cover losses to date) payments to SLL are made on a monthly basis following submission of management accounts showing the extent of any losses. These accounts will be reviewed by the Service Director: Place in consultation with the Service Director: Resources, Executive Member for Environment and Leisure and Executive Member for Finance and IT. The affordability of payments will be kept under constant review by the Service Director: Resources, in consultation with the Executive Member for Finance and IT.

 

(4)       That Council notes that, in the event of higher levels of support being provided, budget savings in future years (2022/23 onwards) will need to be delivered more quickly than currently forecast.

 

REASON FOR DECISIONS: To seek approval to provide financial support on an open-book basis to SLL to enable the leisure facilities to be open when Covid-19 restrictions allow.

Audio Recording of Meeting MP3 94 MB