27 DISCUSSION PAPER - STAFF SURVEY 2024 PDF 199 KB
To receive a discussion paper on the Staff Survey carried out in 2024.
Additional documents:
Decision:
RESOLVED: That the Committee commented on and noted the Discussion Paper on Staff Survey 2024.
Minutes:
Audio recording – 21 minutes 26 seconds
The Service Director – Resources presented the Discussion Paper entitled ‘Staff Survey 2024’ and advised that:
· The first paragraph of the report gave background on the Staff Survey and detail how it had been conducted.
· The Action Plan contained a long list of actions that were developed to address the comments and concerns that had been raised from the survey.
· Feedback from the survey as well as general comments from staff indicated that the Council was a good place to work, however there was always room for improvement.
· There was a focus on certain situations where staff did not feel safe and specific actions had been developed to address these.
· Workloads and pay were recurring points of discussion at the Council and comments had been raised on these in the Staff Survey. The Council were limited with their resources to action these points, however, they would still look to investigate them where possible.
· There were false notions that training budgets had been cut and an action had been developed to reassure staff that this had not taken place.
· A Staff Conference would be likely to take place across three to four days in the autumn.
· Appendix A detailed the Staff Survey Action Plan which had been discussed at the Staff Briefing and published onto the intranet.
The following Members asked questions:
· Councillor Val Bryant
· Councillor Ruth Brown
· Councillor Rhona Cameron
· Councillor Claire Strong
In response to questions, the Service Director – Resources advised that:
· Engaging with four hundred people in one large venue for the Staff Conference would be difficult, however, they could look into it and compare it with the current plan in place.
· It would be best for the Customer & Digital Services Manager to give information on the staff provisions in the Customer Service Team and so the question in relation to this would be answered after the meeting.
· Customer Service Officers generally received one of the lower grades of pay, however they were not neglected in terms of support and had access to the same resources that were available to the rest of staff.
· Recruitment to the Customer Service Team would continue to be an issue, however, they had made progress on this and would continue to work to secure its future in terms of staffing.
· The Union wanted the Council to provide updates on Local Government Reorganisation in meetings with them going forward. The Council already provided updates in staff briefings on this topic.
· Cabinet agreed a risk in relation to Local Government Reorganisation and Devolution on 18 March. This included HR implications on getting to the stage of devolution, and the impact on staff in terms of change.
· The Devolution White Paper had brough a lot of uncertainty to the Council, but they did not want this to cause undue concern amongst staff.
· Cabinet had expressed their desire to see staff surveys to check in on staff wellbeing and this would be carried out in due course.