Issue - meetings

REPORT OF THE SERVICE DIRECTOR – RESOURCES

To consider the draft budget for 2019/20 and the main factors which contribute to the determination of the North Hertfordshire District Council (NHDC) Council Tax level. To consider the appropriate level of Council Tax that will be recommended to the meeting of the Council on the 7 February 2019.

RECOMMENDED TO CABINTET:

(1)       That Cabinet notes the expected Central Government funding levels.

(2)       That Cabinet notes the estimated position on the Collection Fund and how this will be funded.

(3)       That Cabinet confirms that Council Tax increases for 2019/20 should be in line with the Medium Term Financial Strategy.

(4)       That Cabinet notes the position relating to the General Fund balance and that due to the risks identified a minimum balance of £1.96 million is recommended.

(5)       That Cabinet approves the increase in the 2018/19 working budget of £116k, and to note the expected impact in 2019/20 of a £164k reduction in budget.

(6)       That Cabinet notes and comments on the requests for the carry-forward of budget of £41k from 2018/19 to 2019/20.

(7)       That Cabinet approves the inclusion of the efficiencies and investment proposals at Appendix B in the General Fund budget estimates for 2019/20.

(8)       That Cabinet notes the savings target in future years.

(9)       That Cabinet notes the estimated 2019/20 net expenditure of £15.1 million, as detailed in Appendix A, and recommends this budget to Council.

REASON FOR DECISIONS:

(1)          To ensure that all relevant factors are taken into consideration when arriving at the proposed Council Tax precept for 2019/20.

(2)          To ensure that the Cabinet recommends a balanced budget to Council on 7 February 2019.

Audio Recording – Start time of Item – 20 minutes and 11 seconds

The Service Director - Resources explained the main points of the Revenue Budget for 2019/20.

Section 8.1 – page 73

·         Draft Settlement was positive in terms of where it could have landed compared to previous forecasts especially negative revenue support grants.

Section 8.1.7

·         Summary of funding over the next few years in terms of Central Government Grants;

·         New homes bonus – educated guess.

Section 8.1.9

·         Benefit administration for initiative grant from NHCLG was going down by £44,000 from £474 in 2018/19 to £430 in 2019/20.  Additional pressure in the budget estimates and general funding to reflect this.  Same amount of work just that grant cut.

Section 8.2

·         There was a small surplus on Council Tax collection funds and deficit on business rate collection funds; funded from Section 31 grant to receive from central government for the mandatory reliefs less business rates required.

Section 8.26 – 8.27

·         Pilot status had been awarded for next year. 

Section 8.28 – 8.29

·         Council tax and limits regarding maximum increases without the need for a referendum.

Section 8.3    

·         Reserve balances for specific projects and events.

Section 8.3.3

·         Looked at balances on provisions which are known liabilities so estimates can be made.  There was enough to recommend to Full Council that the minimum balance be made up of two elements.  There was a table on page 82.

Section 8.3.7

·         Budget review was at the end of November.  There were two significant variances with ongoing impact shown on page 83.

Section 8.5

·         Savings and investment proposals were virtually the same as last time.  Some changes were made by Cabinet as shown on Page 91, Appendix B.  There was a change to E2 and initially a saving in one year only; in relation to area wide parking reviews and was now extended across the full four years with £65,000 saving; 

·         Page 92 – there was a series of single year investments starting with R9 – R13. 

Page 85 gave an overall summary for 2019/20.

Questions were received from Members following Ian Couper’s presentation:

·         There were no significant areas in terms of the HR proposals put forward;  There were some previous efficiencies with ongoing impacts: PE1 on page 92 had HR implications.  There had been a series of staffing savings in previous years around the senior management restructure and there had been follow-on from that in terms of savings and those had been dealt with over the past year, delivering savings put forward in previous budgets.  It was standard practice to put this in; 

·         The reason for the Housing Benefit Administration Grant going down was unknown and Ian Couper would look into it and find out why; 

·         As part of the quarterly revenue monitoring review where the incidence of risk occurred, a running total against the notional total was kept aside and significant numbers came through as a result of this and the service director would use this in assessing the risk for future years;

·         It  ...  view the full minutes text for item 65