Issue - meetings

REPORT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND CONSERVATION MANAGER

Erection of 10no. residential dwellings and provision of car parking area with all associated landscaping and ancillary works (as a revision to application 17/02316/1 approved on 30/05/18) (as amended by drawings received 8th November 2018).

RESOLVED:That, application 18/02299/FP be REFUSED planning permission, as per the Senior Conservation Officer’s recommendations.

REASON:       The principle of residential development on this site would harm the character and appearance of the Barley Conservation Area as it would result in the loss of the existing open land which represents a transitional area from the village fringe to the rural countryside and which commands an important role in providing the rural setting of the Barley Conservation Area. The proposal would therefore harm the special character of the Barley Conservation Area and to a lesser extent, the setting of 'White Posts' a grade II listed building. The in-principle harm would be further exacerbated by the poor standard of design included as part of this proposal, which would be at odds with the semi-rural, edge-of- village context and which would fail to provide a cohesive appearance and form of development. Although the degree of harm is considered to be less than substantial, the public benefits of the proposal do not outweigh the harm that has been identified and which has been afforded significant weight. As a consequence the proposed development is contrary to Policies 6 and 57 of the North Hertfordshire District Local Plan No. 2 - with Alterations, Policies SP5, SP9, SP13, D1, CGB1 and HE1 of the Emerging North Hertfordshire Local Plan 2011-2031 as Modified and Sections 12 and 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2018.

At the request of one of the Members, The Chairman announced that there would be a comfort break of five minutes.

Audio Recording – Start time of Item – 1 hour 1 minute and 41 seconds

Erection of 10 no residential dwellings and provision of car parking area with all associated landscaping and ancillary works (as a revision to application 17/02316/1 approved on 30/05/18) (as amended by drawings received 8^th November 2018).

The Principal Planning Officer provided updates to the report in respect of planning application 18/02299/FP supported by a visual presentation consisting of plans, drawings and photographs of the site.

The following people made a presentation in objection to the application:

·         Mr Jeremy Carlisle (Chair of Barley Parish Council)

·         Councillor Gerald Morris (Member Advocate made a presentation in objection to the application)

The following members asked questions of clarification of Mr Carlisle’s presentation:

·         Councillor Sue Ngwala

The following people made a presentation in support of the application:

·         Mr Bill Bampton

The following members asked clarification of Mr Bampton’s presentation:

·         Councillor Ruth Brown

·         Councillor Harry Spencer-Smith

·         Councillor Michael Weeks

The Committee debated the application.  The following members contributed to the debate:

·         Councillor Tony Hunter

·         Councillor Michael Weeks

·         Councillor Paul Clark

It was proposed, seconded and upon the vote:

RESOLVED:That, application 18/02299/FP be REFUSED planning permission, as per the Senior Conservation Officer’s recommendations.

REASON:       The principle of residential development on this site would harm the character and appearance of the Barley Conservation Area as it would result in the loss of the existing open land which represents a transitional area from the village fringe to the rural countryside and which commands an important role in providing the rural setting of the Barley Conservation Area. The proposal would therefore harm the special character of the Barley Conservation Area and to a lesser extent, the setting of 'White Posts' a grade II listed building. The in-principle harm would be further exacerbated by the poor standard of design included as part of this proposal, which would be at odds with the semi-rural, edge-of- village context and which would fail to provide a cohesive appearance and form of development. Although the degree of harm is considered to be less than substantial, the public benefits of the proposal do not outweigh the harm that has been identified and which has been afforded significant weight. As a consequence the proposed development is contrary to Policies 6 and 57 of the North Hertfordshire District Local Plan No. 2 - with Alterations, Policies SP5, SP9, SP13, D1, CGB1 and HE1 of the Emerging North Hertfordshire Local Plan 2011-2031 as Modified and Sections 12 and 16 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2018.

At the request of one of the Members, The Chairman announced that there would be a comfort break of five minutes.